[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 18:32:54 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin.zhang@...el.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]shmem: reduce one time of locking in pagefault
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 09:15:46 +0800 Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com> wrote:
> I'm running a shmem pagefault test case (see attached file) under a 64 CPU
> system. Profile shows shmem_inode_info->lock is heavily contented and 100%
> CPUs time are trying to get the lock.
I seem to remember complaining about that in 2002 ;) Faulting in a
mapping of /dev/zero is just awful on a 4-way(!).
> In the pagefault (no swap) case,
> shmem_getpage gets the lock twice, the last one is avoidable if we prealloc a
> page so we could reduce one time of locking. This is what below patch does.
>
> The result of the test case:
> 2.6.35-rc3: ~20s
> 2.6.35-rc3 + patch: ~12s
> so this is 40% improvement.
>
> One might argue if we could have better locking for shmem. But even shmem is lockless,
> the pagefault will soon have pagecache lock heavily contented because shmem must add
> new page to pagecache. So before we have better locking for pagecache, improving shmem
> locking doesn't have too much improvement. I did a similar pagefault test against
> a ramfs file, the test result is ~10.5s.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
>
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index f65f840..c5f2939 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
The patch doesn't make shmem_getpage() any clearer :(
shmem_inode_info.lock appears to be held too much. Surely
lookup_swap_cache() didn't need it (for example).
What data does shmem_inode_info.lock actually protect?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists