[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C358AAA.9080400@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:22:02 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "Fehrmann, Henning" <henning.fehrmann@....mpg.de>,
Carsten Aulbert <carsten.aulbert@....mpg.de>
Subject: oops in tcp_xmit_retransmit_queue() w/ v2.6.32.15
Hello,
We've been seeing oops in tcp_xmit_retransmit_queue() w/ 2.6.32.15.
Please see the attached photoshoot. This is happening on a HPC
cluster and very interestingly caused by one particular job. How long
it takes isn't clear yet (at least more than a day) but when it
happens it happens on a lot of machines in relatively short time.
With a bit of disassemblying, I've found that the oops is happening
during tcp_for_write_queue_from() because the skb->next points to
NULL.
void tcp_xmit_retransmit_queue(struct sock *sk)
{
...
if (tp->retransmit_skb_hint) {
skb = tp->retransmit_skb_hint;
last_lost = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq;
if (after(last_lost, tp->retransmit_high))
last_lost = tp->retransmit_high;
} else {
skb = tcp_write_queue_head(sk);
last_lost = tp->snd_una;
}
=> tcp_for_write_queue_from(skb, sk) {
__u8 sacked = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked;
if (skb == tcp_send_head(sk))
break;
/* we could do better than to assign each time */
if (hole == NULL)
This can happen for one of the following reasons,
1. tp->retransmit_skb_hint is NULL and tcp_write_queue_head() is NULL
too. ie. tcp_xmit_retransmit_queue() is called on an empty write
queue for some reason.
2. tp->retransmit_skb_hint is pointing to a skb which is not on the
write_queue. ie. somebody forgot to update hint while removing the
skb from the write queue.
3. The hint is pointing to a skb on the list but the list itself is
corrupt.
I added some debug code and the crash is happening when
tp->retransmit_skb_hint is not NULL but tp->retransmit_skb_hint->next
is NULL. So, #1 is out; unfortunately, I didn't have debug code in
place to discern between #2 and #3.
Does anything ring a bell? This is a production system and debugging
affects quite a number of people. I can put debug code in to discern
between #2 and #3 but I'm basically shooting in the dark and it would
be great if someone has a better idea.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Download attachment "oops.jpg" of type "image/jpeg" (92585 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists