[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1278681467.1900.199.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:17:47 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Joel Schopp <jschopp@...tin.ibm.com>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Call update_group_power only for local_group
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 14:53 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> Also, looking at all this, don't we need to do something like this in
> the nohz load balance?
Yes, I think you're right, thanks!
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> index 9910e1b..ae750e9 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -3598,6 +3598,7 @@ static void nohz_idle_balance(int this_cpu, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
> }
>
> raw_spin_lock_irq(&this_rq->lock);
> + update_rq_clock(this_rq);
> update_cpu_load(this_rq);
> raw_spin_unlock_irq(&this_rq->lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists