[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1278681334.3385.0.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:15:34 -0400
From: Andy Walls <awalls@...metrocast.net>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, oleg@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
fweisbec@...il.com, dwalker@...eaurora.org,
stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de, florian@...kler.org,
andi@...stfloor.org, mst@...hat.com, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
ivtv-devel@...vdriver.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/35] ivtv: use kthread_worker instead of workqueue
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 09:01 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 07/05/2010 07:11 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
> > Assuming the new kthread_worker implementation is OK, this change for
> > ivtv looks good.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Walls <awalls@...metrocast.net>
> > Acked-by: Andy Walls <awalls@...metrocast.net>
>
> May I route this patch through wq branch? As it's not clear how this
> whole patchset will end up, I think it would be better to keep things
> isolated in this branch.
Yes, I think that is the best way to do things.
Regards,
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists