lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 9 Jul 2010 19:32:56 +0200
From:	Daniel Kiper <dkiper@...-space.pl>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Daniel Kiper <dkiper@...-space.pl>,
	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: GSoC 2010 - Migration from memory ballooning to	memory hotplug in Xen

On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 02:34:09AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > The only advantage of using memory hotadd is that the mem_map doesn't
> > > need to be pre-allocated, but that's only a few percent of the memory.
> > >
> > > So it would only help if you want to add gigantic amounts of memory
> > > to a VM (like >20-30x of what it already has).
> >
> > That's not wildly unreasonable on the face of it; consider a domain
> > which starts at 1GB but could go up to 32GB as demand requires.  But
>
> The programs which need 32GB will probably not even start in 1GB :)

I am able to run program which allocates 32GB on machine 1GB... :-)))
Do not underestimate memory overcommit...

Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ