[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C375CC8.2030705@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:30:48 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mmu notifier calls in apply_to_page_range()
On 07/09/2010 09:22 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> mmu notifier only relevant for userland mappings, not kernel
> mappings. I don't know about the xen use, but for vmalloc certainly it
> can't be a problem to remove those two mmu notifier invalidates.
>
> Only bit that is worrysome is the mm == &init_mm
> pte_alloc_kernel|pte_alloc_map_lock. That seems to imply it may also
> be used to mangle over userland. But apparently all users are passing
> &init_mm as expected. I guess if you remove the mm parameter and you
> default to &init_mm definitely there will be no risk in removing the
> mmu notifier range_start/end invalidates.
>
No, we do have some users which use it on user memory. But those users
are using it as part of their own mmu notifier backend, so the recursive
calls are causing a problem. My point is that anyone using
apply_to_page_range should be making their own calls to mmu notifiers as
appropriate to whatever they're doing.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists