[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100709190902.GC1669@ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 21:09:02 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Norbert Preining <preining@...ic.at>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: high power consumption in recent kernels
On Thu 2010-07-08 11:06:32, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 01:45 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
>
> > it seems that some of the (?)recent(?) changes have increased the
> > power consumption of my note book considerably.
> >
> > First of all, running powertop with normal programs started, but
> > doing nothing, I am still at 14W while I could go down to 9W before
> > (but the 9W was with dimmed display).
> >
> > In the list of top causes for wakeup I have
> > Top causes for wakeups:
> > 34.2% (185.3) [kernel scheduler] Load balancing tick
> > 23.9% (129.6) [extra timer interrupt]
> > 10.8% ( 58.6) firefox-bin
> > 9.2% ( 49.7) [iwlagn] <interrupt>
> > 7.2% ( 39.1) [kernel core] hrtimer_start (tick_sched_timer)
> > 3.9% ( 20.9) PS/2 keyboard/mouse/touchpad interrupt
> > which show one new thing to me I haven't seen before, the Loa balancing tick.
>
14W vs 9W is very significant -- is some DMA keeping system from
entering C3? rmmod usb?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists