[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C384620.8040808@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 12:06:24 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
CC: mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, bphilips@...e.de,
yinghai@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
gregkh@...e.de, khali@...ux-fr.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] libata: use IRQ expecting
On 07/02/2010 04:41 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Jeff.
>
> So, something like the following. This should be applied on top of
> the two previous libata patches. The amount of code in the hot path
> is very small. Compared to the cpu actually taking an interrupt and
> accessing hardware, it should be negligible, and this will give us
> working and acceptably performing systems in the presence of most
> types of IRQ problems.
Ping.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists