[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C3D6E0F.20605@garzik.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 03:58:07 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, bphilips@...e.de,
yinghai@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
gregkh@...e.de, khali@...ux-fr.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] libata: use IRQ expecting
On 07/10/2010 06:06 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 07/02/2010 04:41 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Hello, Jeff.
>>
>> So, something like the following. This should be applied on top of
>> the two previous libata patches. The amount of code in the hot path
>> is very small. Compared to the cpu actually taking an interrupt and
>> accessing hardware, it should be negligible, and this will give us
>> working and acceptably performing systems in the presence of most
>> types of IRQ problems.
>
> Ping.
Give me another day or two. I'm working up an alternate patch for
demonstration (still use the irq-expecting api, but differently).
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists