linux-kernel - Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 10 Jul 2010 21:56:21 +0200
From:	Heinz Diehl <htd@...cy-poultry.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR

On 10.07.2010, Christoph Lameter wrote: 

> The following patchset cleans some pieces up and then equips SLUB with
> per cpu queues that work similar to SLABs queues. With that approach
> SLUB wins significantly in hackbench and improves also on tcp_rr.

The patchset applies cleanly, however compilation fails with

[....]
mm/slub.c: In function ‘alloc_kmem_cache_cpus’:
mm/slub.c:2093: error: negative width in bit-field ‘<anonymous>’
make[1]: *** [mm/slub.o] Error 1
make: *** [mm] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
[....]

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/