[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007121010420.14328@router.home>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:11:50 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Heinz Diehl <htd@...cy-poultry.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 10.07.2010, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
> > The following patchset cleans some pieces up and then equips SLUB with
> > per cpu queues that work similar to SLABs queues. With that approach
> > SLUB wins significantly in hackbench and improves also on tcp_rr.
>
> The patchset applies cleanly, however compilation fails with
>
> [....]
> mm/slub.c: In function ‘alloc_kmem_cache_cpus’:
> mm/slub.c:2093: error: negative width in bit-field ‘<anonymous>’
> make[1]: *** [mm/slub.o] Error 1
> make: *** [mm] Error 2
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> [....]
You need a sufficient PERCPU_DYNAMIC_EARLY_SIZE to be configured. What
platform is this? Tejon: You suggested the BUILD_BUG_ON(). How can he
increase the early size?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists