[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinbj4ScYca7WlnUiIKgsVkVbQwEO4ypgxFe5Zbo@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 19:20:57 -0600
From: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
To: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mchehab@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Interrupt Affinity in SMP
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@...il.com> wrote:
> I was able to set eth0 and it's TxRx queues to cpu1, but it is my
> understanding that 0xFFFFFFFF should distribute the interrupts across all
> cpus, much like LOC in my output of /proc/interrupts.
>
> I don't have access to the computer this weekend, but I will provide more
> info on Monday.
That may be chipset dependent, I don't think all chipsets have the
ability to distribute the interrupts like that. Round-robin interrupt
distribution for a given handler isn't optimal for performance anyway
since it causes the relevant cache lines for the interrupt handler to
be ping-ponged between the different CPUs.
>
> -bryan
>
> On Jul 9, 2010 5:48 PM, "Robert Hancock" <hancockrwd@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 07/09/2010 04:59 PM, Bryan Hundven wrote:
>>
>> Mauro, list,
>>
>> (please CC me in replies, I am not...
>
> Tried changing these files to exclude CPU0?
>
> Have you tried running the irqbalance daemon? That's what you likely want to
> be doing anyway..
>
>> =====8<=====8<=====8<=====8<=====8<=====8<=====8<=====8<=====8<=====
>>
>> =====8<=====8<=====8<==...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists