[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1278931563.1537.184.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 06:46:03 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] futex: free_pi_state outside of hb->lock sections
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 12:35 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jul 2010, Darren Hart wrote:
>
> > free_pi_state() calls kfree() and might sleep. To prepare for raw hb->locks,
> > get the calls to free_pi_state() out of the hb->lock() sections.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
> > struct task_struct *task;
> > - spinlock_t *lock_ptr;
> > + raw_spinlock_t *lock_ptr;
>
> How is this related to the changelog ?
Read the reply to himself (V2) ;-)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists