[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100712212126.GA2684@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:21:26 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 12 (debugfs/sysfs/rcu)
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:47:50PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:51:09 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20100709:
>
> Greg,
> What is there about debugfs that requires sysfs?
Look at commit 3348e05a4f25489908d9f7ed4e80ac291ead18f4 almost 5 years
ago:
[PATCH] DEBUG_FS must depend on SYSFS
CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y and CONFIG_SYSFS=n results in the following compile
error:
<-- snip -->
...
LD vmlinux
fs/built-in.o: In function `debugfs_init':
inode.c:(.init.text+0x31be): undefined reference to `kernel_subsys'
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
<-- snip -->
But, there is no "kernel_subsys" anymore, it is called kernel_kobj, and
is in kernel/ksysfs.c and always is built now, even if CONFIG_SYSFS is
disabled.
So it should be safe to remove that dependancy if you want to.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists