linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: Setup early console as early as possible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 Jul 2010 16:37:21 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Setup early console as early as possible

On 07/12/2010 03:57 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 07/12/2010 11:11 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On 07/12/2010 11:09 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>   
>>> On 07/12/2010 10:44 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Peter, while reviewing this patch I found another nit in
>>>> context of early_param usage, so the patch is below. It's
>>>> completely trivial. Actually I thought I've already fixed
>>>> all early_param cases long ago but this one somehow sneaked ;)
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, Yinghai, Peter,
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure but can't we use some boot_param "pad" field for
>>>> "being copied" flag instead of new variable? There is a case
>>>> when boot_param is used as __initdata and I'm not sure we clear
>>>> this section explicitly.
>>>>
>>>>       
>>> Actually, even better would be to simply use boot_params.hdr.version,
>>> which will never be zero.
>>>     
>> Jeremy,
>>
>> any reason that xen cat not use x86_64_start_kernel directly?
>>   
> 
> As I remember it, I split x86_64_start_kernel into two pieces, one
> containing the bits that were awkward with Xen.  I don't remember which
> were the problematic parts, but it all looks pretty tricky.  Specifically:
> 
>     * Xen will pre-clear the bss, so that's not necessary
>     * we don't go via head, so cleanup_highmap isn't either
>     * PV domains don't have an IDT available to them, or any of their
>       associated structures
> 
> So the whole thing looks at best reundant, and at worst has the
> potential for causing subtle damage.
> 
> Why do you ask?  Does it relate to the early console stuff, or are you
> just asking because you're looking at it?

yes, make setup_early_console()/copy_bootdata two times....

and that looks strange.

 
+static int __initdata bootdata_copied;
 static void __init copy_bootdata(char *real_mode_data)
 {
        char * command_line;
 
+       if (bootdata_copied)
+               return;
+
        memcpy(&boot_params, real_mode_data, sizeof boot_params);
        if (boot_params.hdr.cmd_line_ptr) {
                command_line = __va(boot_params.hdr.cmd_line_ptr);
                memcpy(boot_command_line, command_line, COMMAND_LINE_SIZE);
        }
+
+       bootdata_copied = 1;
 }
 
 void __init x86_64_start_kernel(char * real_mode_data)
@@ -73,6 +80,10 @@ void __init x86_64_start_kernel(char * real_mode_data)
        /* clear bss before set_intr_gate with early_idt_handler */
        clear_bss();
 
+       /* boot_params is in bss */
+       copy_bootdata(__va(real_mode_data));
+       setup_early_console();
+
        /* Make NULL pointers segfault */
        zap_identity_mappings();
 
@@ -97,8 +108,11 @@ void __init x86_64_start_kernel(char * real_mode_data)
 void __init x86_64_start_reservations(char *real_mode_data)
 {
        copy_bootdata(__va(real_mode_data));
+       setup_early_console();
+

Thanks

Yinghai Lu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/