[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C3CA5A9.6000607@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:43:05 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Setup early console as early as possible
Hi Yingahai,
Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On 07/12/2010 08:47 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 07/12/2010 01:58 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>> Hi Yinghai,
>>>
>>> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>> Analyze "console=uart8250,io,0x3f8,115200n8" in
>>>> i386_start_kernel/x86_64_start_kernel,
>>>> and call setup_early_serial8250_console() to init early serial console.
>>>>
>>>> only can handle io port kind of 8250. because mmio need ioremap.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
>>> What's the purpose of this patch? Does it make my early boot I/O patch
>>> obsolete?
>>>
>>> Pekka
>> No, they're complementary. Your patch serial-port enables the RM
>> kernel, whereas Yinghai pushes the initialization earlier in the PM kernel.
>
> yes. cover more range.
>
> Can you consider to ask Pekka to anaylze "console=uart8250,io, 0x3f8,115200n8" instead?
>
> it looks like we can remove "earlyprintk=ttyS0,115200", or "earlyprintk=serial" etc.
>
> earlycon=uart8250 or console=uart8250 should be better than earlyprintk.
> because it is shared between different archs already.
So just to clarify: I wasn't ignoring your comment here. I simply
followed hpa's recommendation on which I also happen to agree with
completely. ;-)
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists