[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1279008849.2096.913.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:14:09 +0800
From: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
Peter,
perf doesn't work on my Nehalem EX machine.
1) The 1st start of 'perf top' is ok;
2) Kill the 1st perf and restart it. It doesn't work. No data is showed.
I located below commit:
commit 1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Date: Fri Mar 26 14:08:44 2010 +0100
perf, x86: Add Nehelem PMU programming errata workaround
workaround From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Date: Fri Mar 26 13:59:41 CET 2010
Implement the workaround for Intel Errata AAK100 and AAP53.
Also, remove the Core-i7 name for Nehalem events since there are
also Westmere based i7 chips.
If I comment out the workaround in function intel_pmu_nhm_enable_all,
perf could work.
A quick glance shows:
wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0x3);
should be:
wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0x7);
I triggered sysrq to dump PMU registers and found the last bit of
global status register is 1. I added a status reset operation like below patch:
--- linux-2.6.35-rc5/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c 2010-07-14 09:38:11.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-2.6.35-rc5_fork/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c 2010-07-14 14:41:42.000000000 +0800
@@ -505,8 +505,13 @@ static void intel_pmu_nhm_enable_all(int
wrmsrl(MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 + 1, 0x4300B1);
wrmsrl(MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 + 2, 0x4300B5);
- wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0x3);
+ wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0x7);
wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0x0);
+ /*
+ * Reset the last 3 bits of global status register in case
+ * previous enabling causes overflows.
+ */
+ wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL, 0x7);
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[i];
However, it still doesn't work. Current right way is to comment out
the workaround.
Yanmin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists