linux-kernel - Re: perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100713085019.GB7984@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:50:19 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc


* Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> Peter,
> 
> perf doesn't work on my Nehalem EX machine.
> 1) The 1st start of 'perf top' is ok;
> 2) Kill the 1st perf and restart it. It doesn't work. No data is showed.
> 
> I located below commit:
> commit 1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15
> Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Date:   Fri Mar 26 14:08:44 2010 +0100
> 
>     perf, x86: Add Nehelem PMU programming errata workaround
>     
>     workaround From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
>     Date: Fri Mar 26 13:59:41 CET 2010
>     
>     Implement the workaround for Intel Errata AAK100 and AAP53.
>     
>     Also, remove the Core-i7 name for Nehalem events since there are
>     also Westmere based i7 chips.
> 
> 
> If I comment out the workaround in function intel_pmu_nhm_enable_all,
> perf could work.
> 
> A quick glance shows:
> wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0x3);
> should be:
> wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0x7);

> I triggered sysrq to dump PMU registers and found the last bit of
> global status register is 1. I added a status reset operation like below patch:
> 
> --- linux-2.6.35-rc5/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c	2010-07-14 09:38:11.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-2.6.35-rc5_fork/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c	2010-07-14 14:41:42.000000000 +0800
> @@ -505,8 +505,13 @@ static void intel_pmu_nhm_enable_all(int
>  		wrmsrl(MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 + 1, 0x4300B1);
>  		wrmsrl(MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 + 2, 0x4300B5);
>  
> -		wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0x3);
> +		wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0x7);
>  		wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0x0);
> +		/*
> +		 * Reset the last 3 bits of global status register in case
> +		 * previous enabling causes overflows.
> +		 */
> +		wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL, 0x7);
>  
>  		for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
>  			struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[i];
>
> 
> However, it still doesn't work. Current right way is to comment out
> the workaround.

Well, how about doing it like this:

		wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0x7);
		/*
		 * Reset the last 3 bits of global status register in case
		 * previous enabling causes overflows.
		 */
		wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL, 0x7);
  
 		for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
  			struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[i];
			...
		}

  		wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0x0);

I.e. global-mask, overflow-clear, explicit-enable, then global-enable?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/