linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tproxy: nf_tproxy_assign

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1279032023.2634.384.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:40:23 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Felipe W Damasio <felipewd@...il.com>
Cc:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tproxy: nf_tproxy_assign_sock() can handle tw sockets

Le mardi 13 juillet 2010 à 11:24 -0300, Felipe W Damasio a écrit :
> Hi Mr. Dumazet,
> 
> 2010/7/12 Felipe W Damasio <felipewd@...il.com>:
> > Here's the result using ethtool-2.6.34:
> >
> > ./ethtool -k eth1
> >
> > Offload parameters for eth1:
> > rx-checksumming: on
> > tx-checksumming: on
> > scatter-gather: on
> > tcp-segmentation-offload: on
> > udp-fragmentation-offload: off
> > generic-segmentation-offload: on
> > generic-receive-offload: off
> > large-receive-offload: off
> > ntuple-filters: off
> > receive-hashing: off
> >
> >
> > ./ethtool -k eth2
> >
> > Offload parameters for eth2:
> > rx-checksumming: on
> > tx-checksumming: on
> > scatter-gather: on
> > tcp-segmentation-offload: on
> > udp-fragmentation-offload: off
> > generic-segmentation-offload: on
> > generic-receive-offload: off
> > large-receive-offload: off
> > ntuple-filters: off
> > receive-hashing: off
> 
> Did these help you track down the issue?
> 
> Sorry to insist, it's just that my bosses are kind of pressuring me to
> solve the problem and put the squid machine back online :-)
> 
> Is there a test I can run to try and trigger the issue?
> 
> I have the same scenario (hardware and network setup) on my lab...
> 

I currently have no fresh ideas. If you want this problem to be solved,
its important to setup in your lab a workload to trigger again and again
the bug, in order to provide us more crash information.

After code review doesnt spot obvious bugs, this is time for brute force
hunting, using git bisection for example...



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/