linux-kernel - Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:25:21 +0200
From:	Heinz Diehl <htd@...cy-poultry.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR

On 14.07.2010, Christoph Lameter wrote: 

> I dont see anything in there at first glance that would cause slub to
> increase its percpu usage. This is straight upstream?

Yes ,it's plain vanilla 2.6.35-rc4/-rc5 from kernel.org.

> Try to just comment out the BUILD_BUG_ON.

I first bumped it up to 24k, but that was obviously not enough, so I
commented out the BUILD_BUG_ON which triggers the build error. Now It builds
fine, and I'll do some testing.

Thanks,
Heinz.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/