[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007141316530.26119@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Heinz Diehl <htd@...cy-poultry.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > Can you get us the config file. What is the value of
> > > PERCPU_DYMAMIC_EARLY_SIZE?
> >
> > My .config file is attached. I don't know how to find out what value
> > PERCPU_DYNAMIC_EARLY_SIZE is actually on, how could I do that? There's
> > no such thing in my .config.
>
> I dont see anything in there at first glance that would cause slub to
> increase its percpu usage. This is straight upstream?
>
The problem is that he has CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT=10 and struct kmem_cache has
an array of struct kmem_cache_node pointers with MAX_NUMNODES entries
which blows its size up to over 8K. That's probably overkill for his
quad-core 8GB AMD, so I'd recommend lowering CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT to 6.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists