[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100714.140718.115934967.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sbhatewara@...are.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pv-drivers@...are.com, ronghua@...are.com, matthieu@...are.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.35-rc1] net-next: vmxnet3 fixes [4/5] Do not reset
when the device is not opened
From: Shreyas Bhatewara <sbhatewara@...are.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
>
> Do not reset when the device is not opened
>
> If a reset is scheduled, and the device goes thru close and open, it
> may happen that reset and open may run in parallel.
> The reset code now bails out if the device is not opened.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ronghua Zang <ronghua@...are.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Bucchianeri <matthieu@...are.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shreyas Bhatewara <sbhatewara@...are.com>
Testing IFF_UP is just making your race hole a little smaller but
it isn't fixing the problem.
In fact, there really isn't any legitimate reason for a driver
to test the IFF_UP state bit. netif_running() is the correct
test, and asynchronous work queue things like resets should
synchronize with open/close using the RTNL lock so that your
test of netif_running() is a stable one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists