[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100714211230.GA4624@feather>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:12:31 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 27/30] rcu: apply ->rda changes to
rcutree_trace.c
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 01:10:01PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> The print_rcu_pendings() function used the ->rda[] array, so this
> commit makes it instead use per_cpu_ptr().
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/rcutree_trace.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
> index 36c95b4..458e032 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
> @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static void print_rcu_pendings(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
> struct rcu_data *rdp;
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - rdp = rsp->rda[cpu];
> + rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
> if (rdp->beenonline)
> print_one_rcu_pending(m, rdp);
> }
For the final version of this patchset, this should get squashed into
the previous patch, right? Otherwise, the state after the previous
patch but before this one won't compile.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists