linux-kernel - Re: stable? quality assurance?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
From:	david@...g.hm
To:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
cc:	Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stable? quality assurance?

On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Stefan Richter wrote:

> Plus, a
> good bug report often requires experience or good intuition, besides
> patience and rigor.

In my experience these are less of a requirement than patience and 
persistence. With these attributes you will be able to work your way 
through figuring out what data is needed for this bug report by answering 
questions (and if you get no response, trying again)

nobody starts off knowing how to report a bug, and frequently you don't 
start off knowing all the info that will be needed to solve the bug, but 
if you report it and keep digging you will almost always get helped.

David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/