lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 23:59:01 -0700 From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> To: William Pitcock <nenolod@...eferenced.org> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: stable? quality assurance? On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 07:58:42PM +0400, William Pitcock wrote: > 2.6.32.16 (possibly 2.6.32.15) has a regression where it is unusable > as a Xen domU. I would say 2.6.32.12 is the best choice since who knows > what other regressions there are in .16. Did you happen to tell the stable maintainer about this and do a simple 'git bisect' to find the offending patch so that it can be resolved? {sigh} -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists