linux-kernel - Re: stable? quality assurance?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100716065901.GA31612@kroah.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Jul 2010 23:59:01 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	William Pitcock <nenolod@...eferenced.org>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stable? quality assurance?

On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 07:58:42PM +0400, William Pitcock wrote:
> 2.6.32.16 (possibly 2.6.32.15) has a regression where it is unusable
> as a Xen domU.  I would say 2.6.32.12 is the best choice since who knows
> what other regressions there are in .16.

Did you happen to tell the stable maintainer about this and do a simple
'git bisect' to find the offending patch so that it can be resolved?

{sigh}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/