[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100715121912.GA7176@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:19:12 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Sridhar Samudrala <samudrala@...ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] vhost-net: avoid flush under lock
We flush under vq mutex when changing backends.
This creates a deadlock as workqueue being flushed
needs this lock as well.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612421
Drop the vq mutex before flush: we have the device mutex
which is sufficient to prevent another ioctl from touching
the vq.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
---
drivers/vhost/net.c | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index 28d7786..50df58e6 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -534,11 +534,16 @@ static long vhost_net_set_backend(struct vhost_net *n, unsigned index, int fd)
rcu_assign_pointer(vq->private_data, sock);
vhost_net_enable_vq(n, vq);
done:
+ mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
+
if (oldsock) {
vhost_net_flush_vq(n, index);
fput(oldsock->file);
}
+ mutex_unlock(&n->dev.mutex);
+ return 0;
+
err_vq:
mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
err:
--
1.7.2.rc0.14.g41c1c
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists