[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100715123744.GA7831@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:37:44 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Sridhar Samudrala <samudrala@...ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost-net: avoid flush under lock
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 03:19:12PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> We flush under vq mutex when changing backends.
> This creates a deadlock as workqueue being flushed
> needs this lock as well.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612421
>
> Drop the vq mutex before flush: we have the device mutex
> which is sufficient to prevent another ioctl from touching
> the vq.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
Dave, just to clarify, I'll send pull request to merge it through my tree,
there's no need for you to bother with this.
> ---
> drivers/vhost/net.c | 5 +++++
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> index 28d7786..50df58e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> @@ -534,11 +534,16 @@ static long vhost_net_set_backend(struct vhost_net *n, unsigned index, int fd)
> rcu_assign_pointer(vq->private_data, sock);
> vhost_net_enable_vq(n, vq);
> done:
> + mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> +
> if (oldsock) {
> vhost_net_flush_vq(n, index);
> fput(oldsock->file);
> }
>
> + mutex_unlock(&n->dev.mutex);
> + return 0;
> +
> err_vq:
> mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> err:
> --
> 1.7.2.rc0.14.g41c1c
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists