[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimVzSzCl2XfWBg5HauYtIT5znxkm6M0yo_1en2b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 02:14:03 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"autofs@...ux.kernel.org" <autofs@...ux.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] autofs/autofs4: move compat_ioctl handling into fs
2010/7/6 Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>:
>
>
> On 06/07/2010, at 7:35 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
>>
>> Well, the only use of the BKL in autofs4 is in the ioctl function. You
>> can probably replace that trivially with a global mutex, but from a quick
>> inspection, even that should not be needed: The only ioctl command in
>> autofs4 that does not already seem to have adequate locking is
>> autofs4_get_set_timeout, which is even easier to change and still harmless
>> if you don't do it at all.
>
> That's right of course.
>
> Even this shouldn't be a problem as it is called by a single instance, per autofs mount, of the daemon only. A fair amount of effort has gone into trying to make the autofs4 module independent of the BKL over time. However I would still rather not do the change concurrently with the ioctl changes.
>
> Ian
In any case, can we let you handle this patch for 2.6.36 inclusion?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists