[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <202899B0-BADE-4CD0-B0E4-1A2FC99397D6@themaw.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 21:17:16 +0800
From: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"autofs@...ux.kernel.org" <autofs@...ux.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] autofs/autofs4: move compat_ioctl handling into fs
On 06/07/2010, at 7:35 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> Well, the only use of the BKL in autofs4 is in the ioctl function. You
> can probably replace that trivially with a global mutex, but from a quick
> inspection, even that should not be needed: The only ioctl command in
> autofs4 that does not already seem to have adequate locking is
> autofs4_get_set_timeout, which is even easier to change and still harmless
> if you don't do it at all.
That's right of course.
Even this shouldn't be a problem as it is called by a single instance, per autofs mount, of the daemon only. A fair amount of effort has gone into trying to make the autofs4 module independent of the BKL over time. However I would still rather not do the change concurrently with the ioctl changes.
Ian
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists