[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100719142349.GE12510@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:23:49 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] vmscan: Kick flusher threads to clean pages when
reclaim is encountering dirty pages
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 02:11:30PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> + /*
> + * If reclaim is encountering dirty pages, it may be because
> + * dirty pages are reaching the end of the LRU even though
> + * the dirty_ratio may be satisified. In this case, wake
> + * flusher threads to pro-actively clean some pages
> + */
> + wakeup_flusher_threads(laptop_mode ? 0 : nr_dirty + nr_dirty / 2);
> +
Where is the laptop-mode magic coming from?
And btw, at least currently wakeup_flusher_threads writes back nr_pages
for each BDI, which might not be what you want. Then again probably
no caller wants it, but I don't see an easy way to fix it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists