linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KERNEL BUILD: Make the setlocalversion script POSIX-compliant.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C45ABFD.8060308@suse.cz>
Date:	Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:00:29 +0200
From:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
To:	Michał Górny <gentoo@...rny.alt.pl>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KERNEL BUILD: Make the setlocalversion script POSIX-compliant.

On 18.7.2010 10:26, Michał Górny wrote:
> The 'source' builtin is a bash alias to the '.' (dot) builtin. While the
> former is supported only by bash, the latter is specified in POSIX and
> works fine with all POSIX-compliant shells I am aware of.
> 
> The '$_' special parameter is specific to bash. It is partially
> supported in dash too but it always evaluates to the current script path
> (which causes the script to enter a loop recursively re-executing
> itself). This is why I have replaced the two occurences of '$_' with the
> explicit parameter.
> 
> The 'local' builtin is another example of bash-specific code. Although
> it is supported by all POSIX-compliant shells I am aware of, it is not
> part of POSIX specification and thus the code should not rely on it
> assigning a specific value to the local variable. Moreover, the 'posh'
> shell has a limited version of 'local' builtin not supporting direct
> variable assignments. Thus, I have broken one of the 'local'
> declarations down into a (non-POSIX) 'local' declaration and a plain
> (POSIX-compliant) variable assignment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <gentoo@...rny.alt.pl>

Thanks a lot, applied to the kbuild tree.


> ---
> 
> There is one 'bashism' left which I wasn't able to fix -- the use of
> 'test -ef'. I'm not aware of any POSIX equivalent of that.

Me neither, POSIX does not know stat(1) AFAICS. Does it matter in real
life? Is there a distro that installs posh or a similarly strict shell
as /bin/sh? It seems to work with dash after your changes.

Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/