[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100721134809.GQ26154@erda.amd.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:48:09 +0200
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] x86, xsave: make xsave_cntxt_init() static
On 20.07.10 18:20:24, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> Perhaps we can fold this patch into
> [PATCH 06/10] x86, xsave: do not initialize xsave in fpu_init()
>
> and probably do fpu_init() first followed by xsave_init() so that
> fpu_init() will set xstate_size based on fpu features and xsave_init()
> can later overwrite xstate_size based on xstate features.
Yes, I will do this instead.
Lookin at this, I found that xsave is broken for (!HAVE_HWFP). This
should be the case if config MATH_EMULATION and 'no387' kernel
parameter are set and xsave exists. xsave will not work because
x86/math-emu and xsave share the same memory. But this case can be
treated as corner case. Maybe we should simply disable xsave then.
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists