[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C471D37.4010208@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:15:51 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
CC: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] x86, xsave: make xsave_cntxt_init() static
On 07/21/2010 06:48 AM, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 20.07.10 18:20:24, Suresh Siddha wrote:
>
>> Perhaps we can fold this patch into
>> [PATCH 06/10] x86, xsave: do not initialize xsave in fpu_init()
>>
>> and probably do fpu_init() first followed by xsave_init() so that
>> fpu_init() will set xstate_size based on fpu features and xsave_init()
>> can later overwrite xstate_size based on xstate features.
>
> Yes, I will do this instead.
>
> Lookin at this, I found that xsave is broken for (!HAVE_HWFP). This
> should be the case if config MATH_EMULATION and 'no387' kernel
> parameter are set and xsave exists. xsave will not work because
> x86/math-emu and xsave share the same memory. But this case can be
> treated as corner case. Maybe we should simply disable xsave then.
>
Yes, I think we should. It is *extremely* unlikely that any such real
hardware will ever be created at this point, and if so we can burn that
bridge when we get to it.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists