linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] x86, xsave: some code cleanups and reworks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100721171718.GF8009@lenovo>
Date:	Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:17:18 +0400
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] x86, xsave: some code cleanups and reworks

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:11:56AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 07/21/2010 10:01 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > 
> > Peter, also I think such tuning must be done at merge window time only,
> > just to not break other's patch queues.
> > 
> 
> Realistically it should be done right after the merge window for the
> *next* merge window.
> 
> 	-hpa
>

ok, which means Robert should use old conventional test at the moment
instead of introducing is_boot_cpu I suppose.

	-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/