lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:24:28 +0200 From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com> To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] x86, xsave: some code cleanups and reworks On 21.07.10 13:17:18, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:11:56AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > On 07/21/2010 10:01 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > > > > > > Peter, also I think such tuning must be done at merge window time only, > > > just to not break other's patch queues. > > > > > > > Realistically it should be done right after the merge window for the > > *next* merge window. > > > > -hpa > > > > ok, which means Robert should use old conventional test at the moment > instead of introducing is_boot_cpu I suppose. Yes, I am just using: if (!smp_processor_id()) ... Cyrill, if you like, I will leave it up to you to introduce the is_boot_cpu() macro. I still have patch 7/7 in my new posting in that removes the boot_cpu_id. If your patch comes soon this will be obsolete as all places will have the macro then. Thanks, -Robert -- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Operating System Research Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists