[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100723120655.GB32608@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 05:06:55 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Jan Safranek <jsafrane@...hat.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Ben Blum <bblum@...rew.cmu.edu>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@...hat.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ivana Hutarova Varekova <varekova@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroupfs: create /sys/fs/cgroup to mount cgroupfs on
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:32:26PM +0200, Jan Safranek wrote:
> On 07/23/2010 04:07 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 04:14:01PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:08:12AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 23:18, Greg KH<gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
>>>>>> For my testing I now always use /cgroup/ and create directories under it
>>>>>> /cgroup/blkio /cgroup/cpu etc and mount controllers on respective
>>>>>> directories.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lennart and Kay, is this what systemd is doing? I really don't think we
>>>>> should be adding a root /cgroup/ mount point to the system for something
>>>>> like this.
>>>>
>>>> Already solved. Systemd always mounts an empty tmpfs at the 'cgroup'
>>>> mountpoint, and stuff is free to create subdirs there. Systemd itself
>>>> mount 'systemd' there.
>>>
>>> Ah, that makes it easier. Paul and Vivek, any objection to this patch
>>> going in now?
>>>
>>
>> This sounds reasonable to me also.
>>
>> Jan, I know you have been working in this area and raised concenrs about
>> cgroup mount point in the past. Does it look good to you?
>
> I would prefer some place where subdirectories can be created for
> individual hierarchies without additional tmpfs there. But as I understand
> /sys, it's not an easy feature to implement it there, so no, I am not
> against /sys/fs/cgroup.
Great, thanks for letting us know.
So, who can get this patch into mainline?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists