linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] tpm_tis: Fix subsequent suspend failures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100723083706.627a4361.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:37:06 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@...glemail.com>
Cc:	Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Debora Velarde <debora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Safford <safford@...son.ibm.com>, jmorris@...ei.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] tpm_tis: Fix subsequent suspend failures

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:07:51 +0200 Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@...glemail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Am Mittwoch 23 Juni 2010 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> > On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:55:54 -0300
> > Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > > (top-posting repaired.  Please don't do that).
> > > > 
> > > > This wasn't a very good way to send a patch.  I edited the diff,
> > > > reconstructed the patch and then assembled a decent-looking changelog. 
> > > > I also changed your acked-by to the required signed-off-by, because you
> > > > were on the patch's delivery path.
> > > > 
> > > > Pretty please: next time, prepare a proper mergeable patch with the
> > > > correct attributions and signoffs?  Thanks.
> > > 
> > > Sure, sorry. I was just not certain if I could just resent Helmut's patch to LKML without messing with his authorship.
> > 
> > You can.  Put his "From:" line right at the top of the changelog and
> > everyone's patch-receiving tools will honour that.  If the From: at the
> > top of the changelog is absent, the tools will fall back to using the
> > From: line in the mail headers.
> 
> This patch still didn't make it into mainline and it fixes a regression.
> Rajiv, do you plan to resubmit the patch or did you expect it to go through
> Andrew's tree?

The patch is presently parked in James's linux-next tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/