linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] tpm_tis: Fix subsequent suspend failures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:53:21 -0300
From:	Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@...glemail.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Debora Velarde <debora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Safford <safford@...son.ibm.com>, jmorris@...ei.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] tpm_tis: Fix subsequent suspend failures


On Jul 23, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Helmut Schaa wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Am Mittwoch 23 Juni 2010 schrieb Andrew Morton:
>> On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:55:54 -0300
>> Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>> (top-posting repaired.  Please don't do that).
>>>> 
>>>> This wasn't a very good way to send a patch.  I edited the diff,
>>>> reconstructed the patch and then assembled a decent-looking changelog. 
>>>> I also changed your acked-by to the required signed-off-by, because you
>>>> were on the patch's delivery path.
>>>> 
>>>> Pretty please: next time, prepare a proper mergeable patch with the
>>>> correct attributions and signoffs?  Thanks.
>>> 
>>> Sure, sorry. I was just not certain if I could just resent Helmut's patch to LKML without messing with his authorship.
>> 
>> You can.  Put his "From:" line right at the top of the changelog and
>> everyone's patch-receiving tools will honour that.  If the From: at the
>> top of the changelog is absent, the tools will fall back to using the
>> From: line in the mail headers.
> 
> This patch still didn't make it into mainline and it fixes a regression.
> Rajiv, do you plan to resubmit the patch or did you expect it to go through
> Andrew's tree?
> 

Hi Helmut,

I expected it to make into Andrew's tree, since his recommendations were for the next time I submit a patch that matched the circumstances of this one, also, he mentioned he had to fix the issues by hand.

Andrew, do you want me to resubmit it? If so, I'm more than ok with that too though.

Thanks,
Rajiv


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/