linux-kernel - Re: [tpmdd-devel] [RFC] tpm_tis: Fix subsequent suspend failures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:42:05 -0300
From:	Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@...glemail.com>,
	David Safford <safford@...son.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
	tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [RFC] tpm_tis: Fix subsequent suspend failures

Nevermind,

I've just read Andrew's previous email that it's parked in James' tree.

Thanks,
Rajiv
On Jul 29, 2010, at 7:53 AM, Rajiv Andrade wrote:

> 
> On Jul 23, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Helmut Schaa wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Am Mittwoch 23 Juni 2010 schrieb Andrew Morton:
>>> On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:55:54 -0300
>>> Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> (top-posting repaired.  Please don't do that).
>>>>> 
>>>>> This wasn't a very good way to send a patch.  I edited the diff,
>>>>> reconstructed the patch and then assembled a decent-looking changelog. 
>>>>> I also changed your acked-by to the required signed-off-by, because you
>>>>> were on the patch's delivery path.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Pretty please: next time, prepare a proper mergeable patch with the
>>>>> correct attributions and signoffs?  Thanks.
>>>> 
>>>> Sure, sorry. I was just not certain if I could just resent Helmut's patch to LKML without messing with his authorship.
>>> 
>>> You can.  Put his "From:" line right at the top of the changelog and
>>> everyone's patch-receiving tools will honour that.  If the From: at the
>>> top of the changelog is absent, the tools will fall back to using the
>>> From: line in the mail headers.
>> 
>> This patch still didn't make it into mainline and it fixes a regression.
>> Rajiv, do you plan to resubmit the patch or did you expect it to go through
>> Andrew's tree?
>> 
> 
> Hi Helmut,
> 
> I expected it to make into Andrew's tree, since his recommendations were for the next time I submit a patch that matched the circumstances of this one, also, he mentioned he had to fix the issues by hand.
> 
> Andrew, do you want me to resubmit it? If so, I'm more than ok with that too though.
> 
> Thanks,
> Rajiv
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
> Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
> of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm
> _______________________________________________
> tpmdd-devel mailing list
> tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/