linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] tools/usb: Add Makefile

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1280153690.2212.10.camel@cowboy>
Date:	Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:14:50 -0400
From:	Davidlohr Bueso <dave.bueso@...il.com>
To:	Michał Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@...sung.com>
Cc:	dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] tools/usb: Add Makefile

On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 13:29 +0200, Michał Nazarewicz wrote:
> You should Cc it to linux-usb@...r.kernel.org as well.
> 
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:50:42 +0200, Davidlohr Bueso <dave.bueso@...il.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch adds a Makefile for building 'testusb'.
> >
> > I am wondering if it should really still use usbdevfs (deprecated),
> > instead of usbfs?
> 
> Patches welcome... ;)  Personally I dunno, I just took David's code
> and changes it a bit.
> 
I am modifying this a bit, will send patch when ready.

> > Thanks,
> > Davidlohr
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@....org>
> 
> I'd say the above is not acceptable as a commit message.  Please
> include only the text that is intended to go to the commit message
> above.  All additional comments may go under the “---” marker.
> 
> > ---
> >  tools/usb/Makefile |   14 ++++++++++++++
> >  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 tools/usb/Makefile
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/usb/Makefile b/tools/usb/Makefile
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..45b5cab
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/usb/Makefile
> > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> > +# Makefile for building 'usbtest'
> > +
> > +CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc
> > +PTHREAD_LIBS = -lpthread
> > +WARNINGS = -Wall
> > +WARNINGS := $(WARNINGS) -Wextra
> 
> Is it necessary?  Wouldn't plain
> 
> WARNINGS = -Wall -Wextra
> 
> suffice?  I am aware “=” can be overridden by command line and
> “:=” cannot but I'd use single line anyway.
> 
> > +CFLAGS = $(WARNINGS) -g $(PTHREAD_LIBS)
> > +
> > +all:
> > +	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o testusb testusb.c
> 
> IMO, you should also include a rule for ffs-test, ie:
> 
> +all: testusb ffs-test
> +
> +%: %.c
> +	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $^
> 
> Not tested.
> 
> > +
> > +clean:
> > +	$(RM) testusb
> 
> Instead:
> 
> > +	$(RM) testusb ffs-test
> 
> > +
> 
> Unnecessary empty line at EOF.
> 
> Other then that, I see no reason why not to include it.
> 
Sorry for the delay, I will redo the patch with the suggestions and
resend.

Thanks,
Davidlohr

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/