[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9168.1280153997@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:19:57 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Add a dentry op to handle automounting rather than abusing follow_link() [ver #2]
Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net> wrote:
> > (4) Stops pathwalk at the automount point and returns that point in the fs
> > tree if it decides not to automount rather than reporting ELOOP (see its
> > use of EXDEV for this).
Does it make autofs easier if d_op->d_automount() is allowed to return -EXDEV
to request this? Then you can return it in Oz mode to allow the daemon to
see/use the underlying mountpoint without recursing back into d_automount().
Ideally, the daemon would use AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT, but there's no way to pass that
to sys_mount() or sys_umount().
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists