[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C4D4C2E.8010103@monstr.eu>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:49:50 +0200
From: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: Use raw_local_irq_save/restore instead local_irq_save/restore
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 26 May 2010 10:42:43 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 10:48 +0200, monstr@...str.eu wrote:
>>> From: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
>>>
>>> start/stop_critical_timing function for preemptirqsoff, preemptoff
>>> and irqsoff tracers contains atomic_inc and atomic_dec operations.
>>>
>>> Atomic operations used local_irq_save/restore macros to ensure
>>> atomic access but they are traced by the same function which is causing
>>> recursion problem.
>>>
>>> The reason is when these tracers are turn ON then local_irq_save/restore
>>> macros are changed in include/linux/irqflags.h to call trace_hardirqs_on/off
>>> which call start/stop_critical_timing.
>>>
>>> Microblaze was affected because use generic atomic implementation.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
>> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>>
>
> Sighed-at-by: me.
>
>>> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/atomic.h b/include/asm-generic/atomic.h
>>> index 058129e..6c190fd 100644
>>> --- a/include/asm-generic/atomic.h
>>> +++ b/include/asm-generic/atomic.h
>>> @@ -57,11 +57,11 @@ static inline int atomic_add_return(int i, atomic_t *v)
>>> unsigned long flags;
>>> int temp;
>>>
>>> - local_irq_save(flags);
>>> + raw_local_irq_save(flags);
>>> temp = v->counter;
>>> temp += i;
>>> v->counter = temp;
>>> - local_irq_restore(flags);
>>> + raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
>>>
>>> return temp;
>>> }
>
> If a developer looks at atomic_add_return() and asks himself "why did
> this use raw_local_irq_save()", the only way of answering that question
> is to go groveling through the git logs, which is a right PITA if
> you're trying to get some coding work done.
>
> Guys, any time you add code which is non-obvious at the raw C level, it
> *needs* a comment!
Andrew: Can you please add this patch to your tree? I have it in
microblaze next branch but should go through different tree.
Thanks,
Michal
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian
View attachment "0001-asm-generic-Use-raw_local_irq_save-restore-instead.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (2296 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists