[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007281601380.19809@kaball-desktop>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:06:26 +0100
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 27 (xen)
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 06:11 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Changes since 20100726:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The xen tree lost its build problems but gained a conflict against Linus'
> >>> tree.
> >> when X86_32=y, SMP=n, X86_LOCAL_APIC=n:
> >>
> >> drivers/built-in.o: In function `xen_callback_vector':
> >> (.text+0x41238): undefined reference to `first_system_vector'
> >>
> >> alloc_intr_gate() calls alloc_system_vector(), which uses first_system_vector.
> > this patch should solve the issue:
>
> So this is a generic x86 build problem?
>
It is, but nobody else is calling alloc_intr_gate with X86_LOCAL_APIC=n;
being a static inline function it didn't cause any problems.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists