[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100728044731.GA2408@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:47:31 +1000
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@...escale.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: Please pull my perf.git urgent branch
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:28:54AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> Doesn't the setting of .period need to be maintained (it is in the other
> powerpc perf_event implementation that this is derived from)?
Gah, yes it does.
> I don't see how this is a security fix -- the existing initializer above
> should zero-fill the fields that are not explicitly initialized. In fact,
> it's taking other fields that were previously initialized to zero and is
> making them uninitialized, since perf_sample_data_init only sets addr and
> raw.
So I misunderstood how an initializer for an automatic struct works.
Brown paper bag time for me... :(
Regarding the other fields, I assume Peter et al. have checked that
they don't need to be cleared, so it's a microoptimization to not
clear them.
> CCing linuxppc-dev on the original patch would have been nice...
True, but at least I can blame Peter Z. for that. :)
Kumar and Ben, how do you want to proceed on this one?
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists