[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100729060004.GD2447@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:00:04 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cred - synchronize rcu before releasing cred
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 01:47:06PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > Yeah. I think there are three alternatives:
>
> There's a fourth alternative too:
>
> (4) I could try and make it so that if the RCU cleanup routine sees it with a
> non-zero usage count, then it just ignores it. This, however, would
> require call_rcu() to be able to cope with requeueing.
It is perfectly legal for an RCU callback to invoke call_rcu(). However,
this should be used -only- to wait for RCU readers. If there are no
RCU readers, the callback might be re-invoked in very short order,
expecially on UP systems.
Or am I misunderstanding what you mean by "require call_rcu() to be
able to cope iwth requeueing"?
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists