linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] Remove owner field from sysfs attribute structure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTinM+m15QbAg+J3YyHWnObsxtHYYU6p6C89p8wjp@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:16:35 -0700
From:	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...stanetworks.com>
To:	Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>
Cc:	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Jani Nikula <ext-jani.1.nikula@...ia.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	Nick Cheng <nick.cheng@...ca.com.tw>,
	James Smart <james.smart@...lex.com>,
	Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@...lex.com>,
	Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@...l.net>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Remove owner field from sysfs attribute structure

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Guenter Roeck
<guenter.roeck@...csson.com> wrote:
> The following comment is found in include/linux/sysfs.h:
>
>   /* FIXME
>    * The *owner field is no longer used.
>    * x86 tree has been cleaned up. The owner
>    * attribute is still left for other arches.
>    */
>
> As it turns out, the *owner field is (again?) initialized in several modules,
> suggesting that such initialization may be creeping back into the code.
>
> This patch set removes the above comment, the *owner field, and each instance
> in the code where it was found to be initialized.
>
> Compiled with x86 allmodconfig as well as with all alpha, arm, mips, powerpc,
> and sparc defconfig builds.

This seems reasonable to me.  Can we get this in linux-next?

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/