linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Wall time clocks + change in access rules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100730135159.596eafe6@dhcp-lab-109.englab.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:51:59 +0200
From:	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
To:	Tomasz Buchert <tomasz.buchert@...ia.fr>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Wall time clocks + change in access rules

On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:23:43 +0200
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com> wrote:

> Anyway, I think we need better rationale, before we can consider your wall 
> clock patches inclusion into the kernel.

To clarify. I'm not against your patches. I just would like to know 
why patches are needed (or maybe even how they are used) to see if there
is no other/better way to solve your problem. We do not want add new
code to kernel (and what more important - maintain it), if problem can
be solved differently.

Stanislaw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/