[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTim=6q1FC8YZvmi2Cju_6+00mHHkNPpCLHB8e3=h@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 10:10:02 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: Fix build failure on !CONFIG_NFS_V3 &&
!CONFIG_NFS_V3
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> FYI, these commits introduced a build failure on x86:
>
> fs/nfs/file.c:508: error: implicit declaration of function ‘nfs_commit_inode’
Grr. Trond?
> @@ -492,11 +492,9 @@ extern int nfs_writeback_done(struct rpc_task *, struct nfs_write_data *);
> extern int nfs_wb_all(struct inode *inode);
> extern int nfs_wb_page(struct inode *inode, struct page* page);
> extern int nfs_wb_page_cancel(struct inode *inode, struct page* page);
> -#if defined(CONFIG_NFS_V3) || defined(CONFIG_NFS_V4)
> extern int nfs_commit_inode(struct inode *, int);
> extern struct nfs_write_data *nfs_commitdata_alloc(void);
> extern void nfs_commit_free(struct nfs_write_data *wdata);
> -#endif
No, I think perhaps the '#if' line should just be moved down one line.
The other function still only exist for V3/V4, it's just
nfs_commit_inode() that is available (as a stub that just returns 0)
for V2.
But maybe that stub should be made an inline function or #define?
Trond?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists