[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1008021639230.32603@tundra.namei.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 16:41:08 +1000 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Tim Gardner <timg@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: Preview of changes to the Security susbystem for 2.6.36
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Kees Cook wrote:
> Well, at least I'll have something for my summit presentation again.
>
> On the other hand, it's rather hard for me to defend against a private NAK.
It's the same nak as before -- I concluded there was consensus on the
lists, but was wrong.
> James, will it stay in security-testing for .37 hopefully?
Not with this approach, I'd imagine.
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists