| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 23:57:46 -0700 From: Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com> To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, Tim Gardner <timg@...onical.com> Subject: Re: Preview of changes to the Security susbystem for 2.6.36 On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 04:41:08PM +1000, James Morris wrote: > On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Kees Cook wrote: > > Well, at least I'll have something for my summit presentation again. > > > > On the other hand, it's rather hard for me to defend against a private NAK. > > It's the same nak as before -- I concluded there was consensus on the > lists, but was wrong. > > > James, will it stay in security-testing for .37 hopefully? > > Not with this approach, I'd imagine. I'm sorry to appear dense, but the most recent NAK from Christoph was here[1], which was for a patch to Yama that is not in security-testing yet. Prior to that, all I could find was this[2] which explicitly asked me to put stuff in a special LSM. I really would like to see it in mainline, but next steps are not clear. -Kees [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/30/31 [2] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/1/78 -- Kees Cook Ubuntu Security Team -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists