[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100802065746.GS3948@outflux.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 23:57:46 -0700
From: Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Tim Gardner <timg@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: Preview of changes to the Security susbystem for 2.6.36
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 04:41:08PM +1000, James Morris wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Well, at least I'll have something for my summit presentation again.
> >
> > On the other hand, it's rather hard for me to defend against a private NAK.
>
> It's the same nak as before -- I concluded there was consensus on the
> lists, but was wrong.
>
> > James, will it stay in security-testing for .37 hopefully?
>
> Not with this approach, I'd imagine.
I'm sorry to appear dense, but the most recent NAK from Christoph was
here[1], which was for a patch to Yama that is not in security-testing
yet. Prior to that, all I could find was this[2] which explicitly asked
me to put stuff in a special LSM.
I really would like to see it in mainline, but next steps are not clear.
-Kees
[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/30/31
[2] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/1/78
--
Kees Cook
Ubuntu Security Team
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists